Comparison

Crunchy Fava-Snack salted vs Mix Apéritif Graines Grillées et Salées

Overall, Crunchy Fava-Snack salted has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCrunchy Fava-Snack saltedMix Apéritif Graines Grillée...
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 492 kcal 620 kcal
Fat 27 g 52 g
Saturated fat 2.6 g 6.7 g
Sugars 2.5 g 4.9 g
Salt 1.2 g 0.6 g
Fiber 12.4 g 8 g
Protein 25 g 23 g
Additives00
AllergensNutsNuts, Peanuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Crunchy Fava-Snack salted has 21% fewer calories (492 kcal vs 620 kcal).
  • Crunchy Fava-Snack salted has 48% less fat (27 g vs 52 g).
  • Crunchy Fava-Snack salted has 61% less saturated fat (2.6 g vs 6.7 g).
  • Crunchy Fava-Snack salted has 49% less sugar (2.5 g vs 4.9 g).
  • Mix Apéritif Graines Grillées et Salées has 50% less salt (0.6 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Crunchy Fava-Snack salted has 36% more fiber (12.4 g vs 8 g).
  • Crunchy Fava-Snack salted has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Mix Apéritif Graines Grillées et Salées lists: Peanuts.

Ingredients

Crunchy Fava-Snack salted

fava beans (33%), almonds (28%), chickpeas (25%), sunflower oil, salt

Mix Apéritif Graines Grillées et Salées

53% cacahuètes (arachides), 23% noix de cajou, 9,7% amandes avec peau, 9,7% noisettes avec peau, 4% huile de tournesol, 0,6% sel. Traces éventuelles d'autres fruits à coque.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Crunchy Fava-Snack salted or Mix Apéritif Graines Grillées et Salées?

Overall, Crunchy Fava-Snack salted has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Crunchy Fava-Snack salted has fewer calories: 492 kcal versus 620 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Crunchy Fava-Snack salted has less sugar: 2.5 g versus 4.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons