Crunchy California Roll vs California combo
Overall, California combo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Crunchy California Roll | California combo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 203 kcal | 143 kcal |
| Fat | 9.9 g | 5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.6 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 5.8 g | 5 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 2.9 g | 2.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- California combo has 30% fewer calories (143 kcal vs 203 kcal).
- California combo has 49% less fat (5 g vs 9.9 g).
- California combo has 35% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 1.6 g).
- California combo has 14% less sugar (5 g vs 5.8 g).
- California combo has 24% more fiber (1.4 g vs 1.1 g).
- Only Crunchy California Roll lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Crunchy California Roll
imitation crab, avocado, and cucumber rolled in sushi rice and seaweed, topped with sesame seeds, spicy mayo, eel sauce, and fried onions
California combo
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Crunchy California Roll or California combo?
Overall, California combo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
California combo has fewer calories: 143 kcal versus 203 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
California combo has less sugar: 5 g versus 5.8 g per 100 g.