Comparison

Crispy coconut rolls vs Galletas saladas

Overall, Galletas saladas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCrispy coconut rollsGalletas saladas
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 467 kcal 491 kcal
Fat 16.7 g 22 g
Saturated fat 15 g 10 g
Sugars 23.3 g 10 g
Salt 0.8 g 2.2 g
Fiber 0 g 2.6 g
Protein 0 g 7 g
Additives04
AllergensEggs, Sesame seeds, CoconutGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Crispy coconut rolls has 24% less fat (16.7 g vs 22 g).
  • Galletas saladas has 33% less saturated fat (10 g vs 15 g).
  • Galletas saladas has 57% less sugar (10 g vs 23.3 g).
  • Crispy coconut rolls has 62% less salt (0.8 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Galletas saladas has 100% more fiber (2.6 g vs 0 g).
  • Galletas saladas has 100% more protein (7 g vs 0 g).
  • Crispy coconut rolls is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Crispy coconut rolls lists: Eggs, Sesame seeds, Coconut.
  • Only Galletas saladas lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Crispy coconut rolls

Organic Coconut Milk, Organic Tapioca Flour, Organic Sugar, Organic Coconut Sugar, Organic Egg, Organic Black Sesame Seeds, Salt.

Galletas saladas

harina de trigo, 19% aceite de girasol alto oleico, jarabe de glucosa-fructosa, azúcar, 2,5% sal, jarabe de malta (cebada, trigo), gasificantes: fosfatos de calcio, carbonatos de sodio, carbonatos de amonio, antoxidante: metabisulfito sódico.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Crispy coconut rolls or Galletas saladas?

Overall, Galletas saladas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Crispy coconut rolls has fewer calories: 467 kcal versus 491 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Galletas saladas has less sugar: 10 g versus 23.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons