Crema di cocco vs Coco cuisine
Overall, Coco cuisine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Crema di cocco | Coco cuisine |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 252 kcal | 173 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 17 g |
| Saturated fat | 24 g | 15.6 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 1.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Protein | 2.7 g | 1.4 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Coco cuisine has 31% fewer calories (173 kcal vs 252 kcal).
- Coco cuisine has 32% less fat (17 g vs 25 g).
- Coco cuisine has 35% less saturated fat (15.6 g vs 24 g).
- Coco cuisine has 47% less sugar (1.6 g vs 3 g).
- Crema di cocco has 48% more protein (2.7 g vs 1.4 g).
Ingredients
Crema di cocco
estratto di noce di cocco 90%, acqua, stabilizzanti (gomma xantano, gomma di guar)
Coco cuisine
Noix de coco* (60%), eau, eau de coco*, épaississant: gomme de guar*. (*Biologique).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Crema di cocco or Coco cuisine?
Overall, Coco cuisine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coco cuisine has fewer calories: 173 kcal versus 252 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Coco cuisine has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 3 g per 100 g.