Coco cuisine (6 % MG) vs Crema di cocco
Overall, Coco cuisine (6 % MG) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coco cuisine (6 % MG) | Crema di cocco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 60 kcal | 252 kcal |
| Fat | 6 g | 25 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.5 g | 24 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 2.7 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Coco cuisine (6 % MG) has 76% fewer calories (60 kcal vs 252 kcal).
- Coco cuisine (6 % MG) has 76% less fat (6 g vs 25 g).
- Coco cuisine (6 % MG) has 77% less saturated fat (5.5 g vs 24 g).
- Coco cuisine (6 % MG) has 93% less sugar (0.2 g vs 3 g).
- Crema di cocco has 89% more protein (2.7 g vs 0.3 g).
Ingredients
Coco cuisine (6 % MG)
Eau de source, crème de coco* 25 % (Sri Lanka), épaississant : gomme de guar*.
Crema di cocco
estratto di noce di cocco 90%, acqua, stabilizzanti (gomma xantano, gomma di guar)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coco cuisine (6 % MG) or Crema di cocco?
Overall, Coco cuisine (6 % MG) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coco cuisine (6 % MG) has fewer calories: 60 kcal versus 252 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Coco cuisine (6 % MG) has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 3 g per 100 g.