Coco cuisine (6 % MG) vs Coco cuisine
Overall, Coco cuisine (6 % MG) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Coco cuisine (6 % MG) | Coco cuisine |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 60 kcal | 173 kcal |
| Fat | 6 g | 17 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.5 g | 15.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 1.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.4 g |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 1.4 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Coco cuisine (6 % MG) has 65% fewer calories (60 kcal vs 173 kcal).
- Coco cuisine (6 % MG) has 65% less fat (6 g vs 17 g).
- Coco cuisine (6 % MG) has 65% less saturated fat (5.5 g vs 15.6 g).
- Coco cuisine (6 % MG) has 88% less sugar (0.2 g vs 1.6 g).
- Coco cuisine has 79% more protein (1.4 g vs 0.3 g).
Ingredients
Coco cuisine (6 % MG)
Eau de source, crème de coco* 25 % (Sri Lanka), épaississant : gomme de guar*.
Coco cuisine
Noix de coco* (60%), eau, eau de coco*, épaississant: gomme de guar*. (*Biologique).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coco cuisine (6 % MG) or Coco cuisine?
Overall, Coco cuisine (6 % MG) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coco cuisine (6 % MG) has fewer calories: 60 kcal versus 173 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Coco cuisine (6 % MG) has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.