Comparison

Costillas barbacoa cortadas vs Côte de porc sans os

Overall, Côte de porc sans os has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCostillas barbacoa cortadasCôte de porc sans os
Nutri-Score d —
NOVA group — 1
Calories 186 kcal 129 kcal
Fat 9.8 g 3.5 g
Saturated fat 3.5 g 1.3 g
Sugars 7 g 0 g
Salt 1.7 g 0.2 g
Fiber 1 g 0 g
Protein 16 g 24 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Côte de porc sans os has 31% fewer calories (129 kcal vs 186 kcal).
  • Côte de porc sans os has 64% less fat (3.5 g vs 9.8 g).
  • Côte de porc sans os has 63% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Côte de porc sans os has no sugar, while Costillas barbacoa cortadas has 7 g.
  • Côte de porc sans os has 91% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Costillas barbacoa cortadas has 100% more fiber (1 g vs 0 g).
  • Côte de porc sans os has 33% more protein (24 g vs 16 g).

Ingredients

Costillas barbacoa cortadas

Not available.

Côte de porc sans os

Viande de porc (100%)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Costillas barbacoa cortadas or Côte de porc sans os?

Overall, Côte de porc sans os has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Côte de porc sans os has fewer calories: 129 kcal versus 186 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Côte de porc sans os has less sugar: 0 g versus 7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons