Costillas barbacoa cortadas vs Côte de porc sans os
Overall, Côte de porc sans os has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Costillas barbacoa cortadas | Côte de porc sans os |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | — |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 186 kcal | 129 kcal |
| Fat | 9.8 g | 3.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.5 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 7 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Côte de porc sans os has 31% fewer calories (129 kcal vs 186 kcal).
- Côte de porc sans os has 64% less fat (3.5 g vs 9.8 g).
- Côte de porc sans os has 63% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 3.5 g).
- Côte de porc sans os has no sugar, while Costillas barbacoa cortadas has 7 g.
- Côte de porc sans os has 91% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.7 g).
- Costillas barbacoa cortadas has 100% more fiber (1 g vs 0 g).
- Côte de porc sans os has 33% more protein (24 g vs 16 g).
Ingredients
Costillas barbacoa cortadas
Not available.
Côte de porc sans os
Viande de porc (100%)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Costillas barbacoa cortadas or Côte de porc sans os?
Overall, Côte de porc sans os has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Côte de porc sans os has fewer calories: 129 kcal versus 186 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Côte de porc sans os has less sugar: 0 g versus 7 g per 100 g.