Comparison

Compote Bio Pommes et Coings vs Confettura di mele cotogne

Overall, Compote Bio Pommes et Coings has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCompote Bio Pommes et CoingsConfettura di mele cotogne
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 69 kcal 162 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.1 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.1 g
Sugars 13.1 g 38.5 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 1.9 g 1.3 g
Protein 0.3 g 0.3 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Compote Bio Pommes et Coings has 57% fewer calories (69 kcal vs 162 kcal).
  • Confettura di mele cotogne has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Compote Bio Pommes et Coings has 66% less sugar (13.1 g vs 38.5 g).
  • Compote Bio Pommes et Coings has 34% more fiber (1.9 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Compote Bio Pommes et Coings has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Compote Bio Pommes et Coings is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Compote Bio Pommes et Coings

Purée de pommes* 76%, purée de coings* 20%, sucre de canne roux 4%, antioxydant : acide ascorbique. *Issus de l'agriculture biologique.

Confettura di mele cotogne

Mele cotogne (70%), zucchero d'uva (23%), succo e scorza di limone (5%), pectina di frutta, brandy

FAQ

Which is healthier: Compote Bio Pommes et Coings or Confettura di mele cotogne?

Overall, Compote Bio Pommes et Coings has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Compote Bio Pommes et Coings has fewer calories: 69 kcal versus 162 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Compote Bio Pommes et Coings has less sugar: 13.1 g versus 38.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons