Comparison

Compote Pommes Coings vs Confettura di mele cotogne

Overall, Compote Pommes Coings has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCompote Pommes CoingsConfettura di mele cotogne
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 47 kcal 162 kcal
Fat 0.1 g 0.1 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.1 g
Sugars 7.7 g 38.5 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 3.2 g 1.3 g
Protein 0.4 g 0.3 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Compote Pommes Coings has 71% fewer calories (47 kcal vs 162 kcal).
  • Compote Pommes Coings has 80% less sugar (7.7 g vs 38.5 g).
  • Compote Pommes Coings has 61% more fiber (3.2 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Compote Pommes Coings has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Compote Pommes Coings is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Compote Pommes Coings

Purée de pommes 65,0% - Purée de coings 35,0% - Antioxydant: Acide ascorbique - SANS GLUTEN

Confettura di mele cotogne

Mele cotogne (70%), zucchero d'uva (23%), succo e scorza di limone (5%), pectina di frutta, brandy

FAQ

Which is healthier: Compote Pommes Coings or Confettura di mele cotogne?

Overall, Compote Pommes Coings has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Compote Pommes Coings has fewer calories: 47 kcal versus 162 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Compote Pommes Coings has less sugar: 7.7 g versus 38.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons