Composée Croquante vs Mâche Roquette Betterave
Overall, Composée Croquante has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Composée Croquante | Mâche Roquette Betterave |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 20 kcal | 31 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.9 g | 2.3 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 2.1 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Composée Croquante has 35% fewer calories (20 kcal vs 31 kcal).
- Composée Croquante has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Composée Croquante has 17% less sugar (1.9 g vs 2.3 g).
- Mâche Roquette Betterave has 50% more protein (2 g vs 1 g).
Ingredients
Composée Croquante
Scarole (mini 30%), frisée (mini 15%), iceberg (mini 10%), chicorée rouge (mini 5%)
Mâche Roquette Betterave
Mâche, roquette, betterave
FAQ
Which is healthier: Composée Croquante or Mâche Roquette Betterave?
Overall, Composée Croquante has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Composée Croquante has fewer calories: 20 kcal versus 31 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Composée Croquante has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.