Comparison

Colin à la provencale vs Saumon rose du pacifique a l'oseille

Overall, Colin à la provencale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientColin à la provencaleSaumon rose du pacifique a l...
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group — —
Calories 64 kcal 105 kcal
Fat 1.6 g 5.4 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 2.8 g
Sugars 2.3 g 1.3 g
Salt 0.5 g 0.5 g
Fiber 0.9 g 0.5 g
Protein 8.8 g 11 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Colin à la provencale has 39% fewer calories (64 kcal vs 105 kcal).
  • Colin à la provencale has 70% less fat (1.6 g vs 5.4 g).
  • Colin à la provencale has 93% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Saumon rose du pacifique a l'oseille has 43% less sugar (1.3 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Colin à la provencale has 44% more fiber (0.9 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Saumon rose du pacifique a l'oseille has 20% more protein (11 g vs 8.8 g).
  • Colin à la provencale has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Colin à la provencale

Not available.

Saumon rose du pacifique a l'oseille

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Colin à la provencale or Saumon rose du pacifique a l'oseille?

Overall, Colin à la provencale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Colin à la provencale has fewer calories: 64 kcal versus 105 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Saumon rose du pacifique a l'oseille has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons