Comparison
Cocos blancs vs Coco de Paimpol
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cocos blancs | Coco de Paimpol |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 337 kcal | 156 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 3.9 g | 2.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 24.4 g | — |
| Protein | 22.3 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Coco de Paimpol has 54% fewer calories (156 kcal vs 337 kcal).
- Coco de Paimpol has 33% less fat (1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Coco de Paimpol has 36% less sugar (2.5 g vs 3.9 g).
- Cocos blancs has 46% more protein (22.3 g vs 12 g).
- Cocos blancs has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Cocos blancs
Cocos blancs.
Coco de Paimpol
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cocos blancs or Coco de Paimpol?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coco de Paimpol has fewer calories: 156 kcal versus 337 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Coco de Paimpol has less sugar: 2.5 g versus 3.9 g per 100 g.