Coco de Paimpol vs Cocos cuisinés
Overall, Cocos cuisinés has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Coco de Paimpol
Cocos cuisinés
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coco de Paimpol | Cocos cuisinés |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 156 kcal | 89 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 1.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 6.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cocos cuisinés has 43% fewer calories (89 kcal vs 156 kcal).
- Cocos cuisinés has no fat, while Coco de Paimpol has 1 g.
- Cocos cuisinés has 44% less sugar (1.4 g vs 2.5 g).
- Coco de Paimpol has no salt, while Cocos cuisinés has 0.9 g.
- Coco de Paimpol has 47% more protein (12 g vs 6.4 g).
Ingredients
Coco de Paimpol
Not available.
Cocos cuisinés
haricots blancs cocos secs trempés, carottes, tomate, oignons, eau, sel
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coco de Paimpol or Cocos cuisinés?
Overall, Cocos cuisinés has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cocos cuisinés has fewer calories: 89 kcal versus 156 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cocos cuisinés has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.