Comparison
Coco de Paimpol vs Haricots coco roses
Overall, Haricots coco roses has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coco de Paimpol | Haricots coco roses |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 156 kcal | 321 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 1.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 2.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 13 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Coco de Paimpol has 51% fewer calories (156 kcal vs 321 kcal).
- Haricots coco roses has 16% less sugar (2.1 g vs 2.5 g).
- Haricots coco roses has 43% more protein (21 g vs 12 g).
- Haricots coco roses has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Coco de Paimpol
Not available.
Haricots coco roses
Haricots
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coco de Paimpol or Haricots coco roses?
Overall, Haricots coco roses has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coco de Paimpol has fewer calories: 156 kcal versus 321 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Haricots coco roses has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.