Coco de Paimpol vs Haricots coco
Overall, Coco de Paimpol has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coco de Paimpol | Haricots coco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 156 kcal | 105 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 3.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 5.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Haricots coco has 33% fewer calories (105 kcal vs 156 kcal).
- Coco de Paimpol has 69% less fat (1 g vs 3.2 g).
- Coco de Paimpol has 82% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 1.1 g).
- Haricots coco has 76% less sugar (0.6 g vs 2.5 g).
- Coco de Paimpol has no salt, while Haricots coco has 0.8 g.
- Coco de Paimpol has 51% more protein (12 g vs 5.9 g).
- Coco de Paimpol has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Coco de Paimpol
Not available.
Haricots coco
Haricots cocos (236 g). bouillon (eau, graisse de canard, tomate 1%, oignons, sel, bouillon de volaille déshydraté (sel, arômes naturels, graisse de poule, extrait de levure, épices et aromates), poivre, piment du Pays Basque, thym).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coco de Paimpol or Haricots coco?
Overall, Coco de Paimpol has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Haricots coco has fewer calories: 105 kcal versus 156 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Haricots coco has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.