Coconut Milk kókusz tej vs ALPRO Barista kokosdrink
Overall, ALPRO Barista kokosdrink has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coconut Milk kókusz tej | ALPRO Barista kokosdrink |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 207 kcal | 33 kcal |
| Fat | 21 g | 1.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 18.6 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 2.1 g | 3.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 1.8 g | 1.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- ALPRO Barista kokosdrink has 84% fewer calories (33 kcal vs 207 kcal).
- ALPRO Barista kokosdrink has 93% less fat (1.4 g vs 21 g).
- ALPRO Barista kokosdrink has 96% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 18.6 g).
- Coconut Milk kókusz tej has 36% less sugar (2.1 g vs 3.3 g).
- Coconut Milk kókusz tej has 78% more fiber (0.9 g vs 0.2 g).
- Coconut Milk kókusz tej has 17% more protein (1.8 g vs 1.5 g).
- ALPRO Barista kokosdrink has the better Nutri-Score.
- Coconut Milk kókusz tej is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Coconut Milk kókusz tej
91% coconut extract, water, guar gum stabilizer,
ALPRO Barista kokosdrink
Water, kokosmelk (5,7%) water, kokosroom (2,6%)]), gepelde abonen (2,9%), suiker, fructose, zu rteregelaar (kaliumfosfaten), calcium (calciumcarbonaat), zeezout, aroma, stabilisator (gellangom).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coconut Milk kókusz tej or ALPRO Barista kokosdrink?
Overall, ALPRO Barista kokosdrink has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
ALPRO Barista kokosdrink has fewer calories: 33 kcal versus 207 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Coconut Milk kókusz tej has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 3.3 g per 100 g.