Comparison

Ciabatta Rolls vs Rebozado crujiente

Overall, Ciabatta Rolls has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCiabatta RollsRebozado crujiente
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group — 4
Calories 247 kcal 378 kcal
Fat 1.2 g 1 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.2 g
Sugars 1.2 g 2.8 g
Salt 1.2 g 2.2 g
Fiber 0 g 3.7 g
Protein 9.4 g 6.4 g
Additives02
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Ciabatta Rolls has 35% fewer calories (247 kcal vs 378 kcal).
  • Ciabatta Rolls has 57% less sugar (1.2 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Ciabatta Rolls has 45% less salt (1.2 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Rebozado crujiente has 100% more fiber (3.7 g vs 0 g).
  • Ciabatta Rolls has 32% more protein (9.4 g vs 6.4 g).
  • Ciabatta Rolls has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Ciabatta Rolls lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Ciabatta Rolls

ENRICHED WHEAT FLOUR (WHEAT FLOUR, NIACIN, REDUCED IRON, THIAMINE MONONITRATE, RIBOFLAVIN, ENZYMES, FOLIC ACID), WATER, CULTURED WHEAT FLOUR (TO MAINTAIN FRESHNESS), SALT, YEAST, SOYBEAN OIL, MALTED BARLEY FLOUR.

Rebozado crujiente

Maíz, arroz, azúcar, sal, emulgente: lecitina de girasol.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Ciabatta Rolls or Rebozado crujiente?

Overall, Ciabatta Rolls has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ciabatta Rolls has fewer calories: 247 kcal versus 378 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Ciabatta Rolls has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 2.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons