Comparison

Churrasco de pollo asado con patatas vs Copos de arroz y trigo integral

Overall, Churrasco de pollo asado con patatas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChurrasco de pollo asado con...Copos de arroz y trigo integ...
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 157 kcal 385 kcal
Fat 9.3 g 1.5 g
Saturated fat 2 g 0.4 g
Sugars 0.8 g 17 g
Salt 1.6 g 1.1 g
Fiber 0.2 g —
Protein 12.4 g 9.4 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedGluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Churrasco de pollo asado con patatas has 59% fewer calories (157 kcal vs 385 kcal).
  • Copos de arroz y trigo integral has 84% less fat (1.5 g vs 9.3 g).
  • Copos de arroz y trigo integral has 80% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 2 g).
  • Churrasco de pollo asado con patatas has 95% less sugar (0.8 g vs 17 g).
  • Copos de arroz y trigo integral has 30% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Churrasco de pollo asado con patatas has 24% more protein (12.4 g vs 9.4 g).
  • Churrasco de pollo asado con patatas has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Copos de arroz y trigo integral lists: Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Churrasco de pollo asado con patatas

muslo de pollo, sal, dextrosa, aceite de oliva, almidon, especias, extracto de levadura, estabilizantes, aroma, patatas, correctores de acidez, sal, azucar. Sin gluten.

Copos de arroz y trigo integral

Cereales (84%) (arroz, trigo integral (21%)), azúcar, gluten de trigo, germen de trigo, sal, extracto de malta de cebada, leche desnatada en polvo,vitaminas [C, niacina (vitamina B3), B6, riboflavina (vitamina B2). tiamina (vitamina B1), ácido fólico (vitamina B9), vitamina B12], hierro, emulgente (mono - y diglicéridos de ácidos grasos), aroma. Puede contener trazas de cacahuete, soja, frutos de cáscara y granos de sésamo. MODO DE USO

FAQ

Which is healthier: Churrasco de pollo asado con patatas or Copos de arroz y trigo integral?

Overall, Churrasco de pollo asado con patatas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Churrasco de pollo asado con patatas has fewer calories: 157 kcal versus 385 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Churrasco de pollo asado con patatas has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 17 g per 100 g.

More comparisons