Comparison

Choux de Bruxelles vs Rosenkohl TK

Overall, Choux de Bruxelles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Better choice
Choux de Bruxelles

Choux de Bruxelles

Priméale
a NOVA 1
Rosenkohl TK

Rosenkohl TK

Freshona · 500g
a

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChoux de BruxellesRosenkohl TK
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 34 kcal 42 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 1.3 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.3 g
Sugars 1.7 g 3 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 3.2 g 2.6 g
Protein 2.6 g 2.9 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Choux de Bruxelles has 19% fewer calories (34 kcal vs 42 kcal).
  • Choux de Bruxelles has 62% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Choux de Bruxelles has 43% less sugar (1.7 g vs 3 g).
  • Choux de Bruxelles has 19% more fiber (3.2 g vs 2.6 g).

Ingredients

Choux de Bruxelles

Choux de Bruxelles

Rosenkohl TK

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Choux de Bruxelles or Rosenkohl TK?

Overall, Choux de Bruxelles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Choux de Bruxelles has fewer calories: 34 kcal versus 42 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Choux de Bruxelles has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Choux de Bruxelles vs Choux de Bruxelles minut... Chou de Bruxelles vs Choux de Bruxelles Choux de Bruxelles minut... vs Rosenkohl TK Choux de bruxelles crème... vs Choux de Bruxelles Choux de bruxelles crème... vs Rosenkohl TK Choux de Bruxelles vs Rosenkohl TK Choux de Bruxelles vs Choux de Bruxelles Choux de Bruxelles vs Rosenkohl TK