Comparison
Choux de Bruxelles vs Rosenkohl TK
Overall, Choux de Bruxelles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Choux de Bruxelles | Rosenkohl TK |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 43 kcal | 42 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 1.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 2.4 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 4.3 g | 2.6 g |
| Protein | 3.4 g | 2.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Choux de Bruxelles has 62% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.3 g).
- Choux de Bruxelles has 20% less sugar (2.4 g vs 3 g).
- Choux de Bruxelles has 40% more fiber (4.3 g vs 2.6 g).
- Choux de Bruxelles has 15% more protein (3.4 g vs 2.9 g).
Ingredients
Choux de Bruxelles
Choux de Bruxelles surgelés.
Rosenkohl TK
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Choux de Bruxelles or Rosenkohl TK?
Overall, Choux de Bruxelles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rosenkohl TK has fewer calories: 42 kcal versus 43 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Choux de Bruxelles has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 3 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Chou de Bruxelles vs Choux de Bruxelles
Choux de Bruxelles vs Rosenkohl TK
Choux de Bruxelles minut... vs Rosenkohl TK
Choux de bruxelles crème... vs Choux de Bruxelles
Choux de bruxelles crème... vs Rosenkohl TK
Choux de Bruxelles vs Choux de Bruxelles minut...
Choux de Bruxelles vs Choux de Bruxelles
Choux de Bruxelles vs Rosenkohl TK