Comparison

Choucroute cuite au vin blanc vs Choucroute au naturel

Overall, Choucroute au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChoucroute cuite au vin blan...Choucroute au naturel
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 27 kcal 16 kcal
Fat 1.5 g 0.2 g
Saturated fat 0.6 g 0 g
Sugars 0.4 g 0.8 g
Salt 1 g 1 g
Fiber 2.8 g 2 g
Protein 0.8 g 1 g
Additives11
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Choucroute au naturel has 41% fewer calories (16 kcal vs 27 kcal).
  • Choucroute au naturel has 87% less fat (0.2 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Choucroute au naturel has no saturated fat, while Choucroute cuite au vin blanc has 0.6 g.
  • Choucroute cuite au vin blanc has 50% less sugar (0.4 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Choucroute cuite au vin blanc has 29% more fiber (2.8 g vs 2 g).
  • Choucroute au naturel has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Choucroute au naturel is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Choucroute cuite au vin blanc

Choucroute crue (chou cru, sel), jus de cuisson, saindoux, vin blanc 1 %, bouillon de volaille déshydraté, baies de genièvre, arôme, antioxydant : acide ascorbique,

Choucroute au naturel

Choucroute* (chou*, sel marin), eau, sel marin, antioxydant : acide ascorbique. *Produits issus de l'agriculture biologique. Souligné : origine France (100% des ingrédients agricoles bio).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Choucroute cuite au vin blanc or Choucroute au naturel?

Overall, Choucroute au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Choucroute au naturel has fewer calories: 16 kcal versus 27 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Choucroute cuite au vin blanc has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons