Comparison

Chopped Pork And Ham vs Noix d'épaule cuite choix Désossée

Overall, Noix d'épaule cuite choix Désossée has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChopped Pork And HamNoix d'épaule cuite choix Dé...
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 292 kcal 177 kcal
Fat 24.3 g 12 g
Saturated fat 9.7 g 4.8 g
Sugars 1.3 g 0.2 g
Salt 2.4 g 2.5 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 15 g 17 g
Additives43
AllergensPorkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Noix d'épaule cuite choix Désossée has 39% fewer calories (177 kcal vs 292 kcal).
  • Noix d'épaule cuite choix Désossée has 51% less fat (12 g vs 24.3 g).
  • Noix d'épaule cuite choix Désossée has 51% less saturated fat (4.8 g vs 9.7 g).
  • Noix d'épaule cuite choix Désossée has 85% less sugar (0.2 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Noix d'épaule cuite choix Désossée has 12% more protein (17 g vs 15 g).
  • Noix d'épaule cuite choix Désossée has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Chopped Pork And Ham lists: Pork.

Ingredients

Chopped Pork And Ham

Pork 89%, Salt, Starch, Water, Ham 2%, Sugar, Stabiliser: Trisodium Diphosphate, Flavourings, Antioxidant: Sodium Ascorbate, Preservative: Sodium Nitrite

Noix d'épaule cuite choix Désossée

Porc (85%), eau, sel, gélatine, dextrose, antioxydant (ascorbate de sodium), conservateur (nitrite de sodium).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chopped Pork And Ham or Noix d'épaule cuite choix Désossée?

Overall, Noix d'épaule cuite choix Désossée has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Noix d'épaule cuite choix Désossée has fewer calories: 177 kcal versus 292 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Noix d'épaule cuite choix Désossée has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons