Comparison

Chocolat Banane Nilk2Go vs Oat shake

Overall, Chocolat Banane Nilk2Go has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientChocolat Banane Nilk2GoOat shake
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 50 kcal 64 kcal
Fat 1.4 g 0.8 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0.5 g
Sugars 4.6 g 12 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 0.9 g
Protein 0.6 g 0.9 g
Additives42
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chocolat Banane Nilk2Go has 22% fewer calories (50 kcal vs 64 kcal).
  • Oat shake has 43% less fat (0.8 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Chocolat Banane Nilk2Go has 62% less sugar (4.6 g vs 12 g).
  • Oat shake has 100% more fiber (0.9 g vs 0 g).
  • Oat shake has 33% more protein (0.9 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Chocolat Banane Nilk2Go has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Chocolat Banane Nilk2Go

Eau, avoine (10 %), purée de banane" (7%), cacao* (1,4 %), huile de tournesol", épaississant: gomme de Guar", sel de mer, extrait de vanille bourbon, épaississant: gellan, correcteur d'acidité: carbonate de çalcium. * issu de l'agriculture biologique.

Oat shake

Sok winogronowy (33 %), przecier owsiany (22,5 %), sok pomarańczowy (16,5%), przecier bananowy (15 %), sok jabłkowy (10%), ekstrakt z miąższu kokosa (3%), stabilizatory: guma ksantanowa, guma gellan; naturalne aromaty, witaminy (witamina A, witamina C). BEZ DODATKU CUKRÓW ZAWIERA NATURALNIE WYSTĘPUJĄCE CUKRY

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chocolat Banane Nilk2Go or Oat shake?

Overall, Chocolat Banane Nilk2Go has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chocolat Banane Nilk2Go has fewer calories: 50 kcal versus 64 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chocolat Banane Nilk2Go has less sugar: 4.6 g versus 12 g per 100 g.

More comparisons