Ricco di natura pesca e avena vs Oat shake
Overall, Ricco di natura pesca e avena has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ricco di natura pesca e aven... | Oat shake |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 33 kcal | 64 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 6.6 g | 12 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ricco di natura pesca e avena has 48% fewer calories (33 kcal vs 64 kcal).
- Ricco di natura pesca e avena has no fat, while Oat shake has 0.8 g.
- Ricco di natura pesca e avena has no saturated fat, while Oat shake has 0.5 g.
- Ricco di natura pesca e avena has 45% less sugar (6.6 g vs 12 g).
- Oat shake has 44% more protein (0.9 g vs 0.5 g).
- Ricco di natura pesca e avena has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Ricco di natura pesca e avena
Not available.
Oat shake
Sok winogronowy (33 %), przecier owsiany (22,5 %), sok pomarańczowy (16,5%), przecier bananowy (15 %), sok jabłkowy (10%), ekstrakt z miąższu kokosa (3%), stabilizatory: guma ksantanowa, guma gellan; naturalne aromaty, witaminy (witamina A, witamina C). BEZ DODATKU CUKRÓW ZAWIERA NATURALNIE WYSTĘPUJĄCE CUKRY
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ricco di natura pesca e avena or Oat shake?
Overall, Ricco di natura pesca e avena has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ricco di natura pesca e avena has fewer calories: 33 kcal versus 64 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ricco di natura pesca e avena has less sugar: 6.6 g versus 12 g per 100 g.