Comparison

SPA Fruit Mango Abricot vs Ricco di natura pesca e avena

Overall, SPA Fruit Mango Abricot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Better choice

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	SPA Fruit Mango Abricot	Ricco di natura pesca e aven...
Nutri-Score	c	d
NOVA group	—	—
Calories	11 kcal	33 kcal
Fat	0 g	0 g
Saturated fat	0 g	0 g
Sugars	2.6 g	6.6 g
Salt	0 g	0 g
Fiber	0 g	0.8 g
Protein	0 g	0.5 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

SPA Fruit Mango Abricot has 67% fewer calories (11 kcal vs 33 kcal).
SPA Fruit Mango Abricot has 61% less sugar (2.6 g vs 6.6 g).
Ricco di natura pesca e avena has 100% more fiber (0.8 g vs 0 g).
Ricco di natura pesca e avena has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
SPA Fruit Mango Abricot has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

SPA Fruit Mango Abricot

Not available.

Ricco di natura pesca e avena

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: SPA Fruit Mango Abricot or Ricco di natura pesca e avena?

Overall, SPA Fruit Mango Abricot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

SPA Fruit Mango Abricot has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 33 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

SPA Fruit Mango Abricot has less sugar: 2.6 g versus 6.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

SPA Fruit Mango Abricot vs Vive Soy - Papaya y Mang... Bio Bananen Drink vs Ricco di natura pesca e... Ricco di natura pesca e... vs Oat shake Ricco di natura pesca e... vs Bebida de zumo de frutas... Gourmand & Végétal Douce... vs Ricco di natura pesca e... Ricco di natura pesca e... vs Vive Soy - Papaya y Mang... Bio Bananen Drink vs SPA Fruit Mango Abricot SPA Fruit Mango Abricot vs Oat shake