Comparison

Ricco di natura pesca e avena vs Vive Soy - Papaya y Mango con Soja

Overall, Ricco di natura pesca e avena has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRicco di natura pesca e aven...Vive Soy - Papaya y Mango co...
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group — —
Calories 33 kcal 40 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.4 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.1 g
Sugars 6.6 g 7.8 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0.8 g 0.3 g
Protein 0.5 g 0.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Ricco di natura pesca e avena has 18% fewer calories (33 kcal vs 40 kcal).
  • Ricco di natura pesca e avena has no fat, while Vive Soy - Papaya y Mango con Soja has 0.4 g.
  • Ricco di natura pesca e avena has 15% less sugar (6.6 g vs 7.8 g).
  • Ricco di natura pesca e avena has 63% more fiber (0.8 g vs 0.3 g).

Ingredients

Ricco di natura pesca e avena

Not available.

Vive Soy - Papaya y Mango con Soja

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Ricco di natura pesca e avena or Vive Soy - Papaya y Mango con Soja?

Overall, Ricco di natura pesca e avena has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ricco di natura pesca e avena has fewer calories: 33 kcal versus 40 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Ricco di natura pesca e avena has less sugar: 6.6 g versus 7.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons