Ricco di natura pesca e avena vs Vive Soy - Papaya y Mango con Soja
Overall, Ricco di natura pesca e avena has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ricco di natura pesca e aven... | Vive Soy - Papaya y Mango co... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 33 kcal | 40 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 6.6 g | 7.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ricco di natura pesca e avena has 18% fewer calories (33 kcal vs 40 kcal).
- Ricco di natura pesca e avena has no fat, while Vive Soy - Papaya y Mango con Soja has 0.4 g.
- Ricco di natura pesca e avena has 15% less sugar (6.6 g vs 7.8 g).
- Ricco di natura pesca e avena has 63% more fiber (0.8 g vs 0.3 g).
Ingredients
Ricco di natura pesca e avena
Not available.
Vive Soy - Papaya y Mango con Soja
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ricco di natura pesca e avena or Vive Soy - Papaya y Mango con Soja?
Overall, Ricco di natura pesca e avena has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ricco di natura pesca e avena has fewer calories: 33 kcal versus 40 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ricco di natura pesca e avena has less sugar: 6.6 g versus 7.8 g per 100 g.