Vive Soy - Papaya y Mango con Soja vs Bebida de zumo de frutas y avena
Overall, Vive Soy - Papaya y Mango con Soja has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Vive Soy - Papaya y Mango con Soja
Bebida de zumo de frutas y avena
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Vive Soy - Papaya y Mango co... | Bebida de zumo de frutas y a... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 40 kcal | 66 kcal |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 1.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 7.8 g | 9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.3 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Vive Soy - Papaya y Mango con Soja has 39% fewer calories (40 kcal vs 66 kcal).
- Vive Soy - Papaya y Mango con Soja has 71% less fat (0.4 g vs 1.4 g).
- Vive Soy - Papaya y Mango con Soja has 89% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1 g).
- Vive Soy - Papaya y Mango con Soja has 13% less sugar (7.8 g vs 9 g).
- Bebida de zumo de frutas y avena has 57% more fiber (0.7 g vs 0.3 g).
- Vive Soy - Papaya y Mango con Soja has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Vive Soy - Papaya y Mango con Soja
Not available.
Bebida de zumo de frutas y avena
Licuado de avena (43%) (30%), zumo de piña, zumo de uva, puré de Coco (5%), zumo de limón, extracto de alga kombu, fibra, aroma natural.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Vive Soy - Papaya y Mango con Soja or Bebida de zumo de frutas y avena?
Overall, Vive Soy - Papaya y Mango con Soja has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Vive Soy - Papaya y Mango con Soja has fewer calories: 40 kcal versus 66 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Vive Soy - Papaya y Mango con Soja has less sugar: 7.8 g versus 9 g per 100 g.