Comparison

Bio Bananen Drink vs Bebida de zumo de frutas y avena

Overall, Bio Bananen Drink has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientBio Bananen DrinkBebida de zumo de frutas y a...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 71 kcal 66 kcal
Fat 3.4 g 1.4 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 1 g
Sugars 7.4 g 9 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber 0.3 g 0.7 g
Protein 1.5 g 0.9 g
Additives10
AllergensGluten, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bebida de zumo de frutas y avena has 59% less fat (1.4 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Bio Bananen Drink has 58% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1 g).
  • Bio Bananen Drink has 18% less sugar (7.4 g vs 9 g).
  • Bebida de zumo de frutas y avena has 57% more fiber (0.7 g vs 0.3 g).
  • Bio Bananen Drink has 40% more protein (1.5 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Only Bio Bananen Drink lists: Gluten, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Bio Bananen Drink

Trinkwasser, Vollkornhafer* (4,9%), Bananenpüree* (3,8%), Rübenzucker*, Sonnenblumenöl*, Sojabohnen* (2,3%), Stärke, Zitronensaftkonzentrat*, natürliches Bananen Aroma*, Verdickungsmittel: Johannisbrotkernmehl*, Gellan; färbende Frucht - und Pflanzenkonzentrate (Kürbis*, Apfel*), Meersalz. *aus kontrolliert biologischem Anbau

Bebida de zumo de frutas y avena

Licuado de avena (43%) (30%), zumo de piña, zumo de uva, puré de Coco (5%), zumo de limón, extracto de alga kombu, fibra, aroma natural.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bio Bananen Drink or Bebida de zumo de frutas y avena?

Overall, Bio Bananen Drink has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bebida de zumo de frutas y avena has fewer calories: 66 kcal versus 71 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bio Bananen Drink has less sugar: 7.4 g versus 9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons