Chocolat Banane Nilk2Go vs Ricco di natura pesca e avena
Overall, Ricco di natura pesca e avena has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chocolat Banane Nilk2Go | Ricco di natura pesca e aven... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 50 kcal | 33 kcal |
| Fat | 1.4 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4.6 g | 6.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ricco di natura pesca e avena has 34% fewer calories (33 kcal vs 50 kcal).
- Ricco di natura pesca e avena has no fat, while Chocolat Banane Nilk2Go has 1.4 g.
- Ricco di natura pesca e avena has no saturated fat, while Chocolat Banane Nilk2Go has 0.4 g.
- Chocolat Banane Nilk2Go has 30% less sugar (4.6 g vs 6.6 g).
- Ricco di natura pesca e avena has 100% more fiber (0.8 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Chocolat Banane Nilk2Go
Eau, avoine (10 %), purée de banane" (7%), cacao* (1,4 %), huile de tournesol", épaississant: gomme de Guar", sel de mer, extrait de vanille bourbon, épaississant: gellan, correcteur d'acidité: carbonate de çalcium. * issu de l'agriculture biologique.
Ricco di natura pesca e avena
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chocolat Banane Nilk2Go or Ricco di natura pesca e avena?
Overall, Ricco di natura pesca e avena has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ricco di natura pesca e avena has fewer calories: 33 kcal versus 50 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chocolat Banane Nilk2Go has less sugar: 4.6 g versus 6.6 g per 100 g.