Chocolat au lait vs Croc sablé Goût choco
Overall, Croc sablé Goût choco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chocolat au lait | Croc sablé Goût choco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 539 kcal | 499 kcal |
| Fat | 31 g | 23 g |
| Saturated fat | 19 g | 11 g |
| Sugars | 55 g | 29 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 2.8 g |
| Protein | 6.5 g | 6.1 g |
| Additives | 2 | 4 |
| Allergens | Milk, Nuts, Soybeans | Gluten, Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Croc sablé Goût choco has 26% less fat (23 g vs 31 g).
- Croc sablé Goût choco has 42% less saturated fat (11 g vs 19 g).
- Croc sablé Goût choco has 47% less sugar (29 g vs 55 g).
- Chocolat au lait has 58% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
- Croc sablé Goût choco has 18% more fiber (2.8 g vs 2.3 g).
- Only Chocolat au lait lists: Nuts.
- Only Croc sablé Goût choco lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Chocolat au lait
Sucre, Beurre de cacao, pâte de cacao, Lait écrémé en poudre, lactosérum en poudre (Lait), Beurre concentré, Émulsifiant (Lécithine de soja), Pâte de noisette, Arôme naturel
Croc sablé Goût choco
Farine de BLÉ 48 %, sucre, huile de palme, cacao maigre en poudre 4 %, lactosérum en poudre (de LAIT), sirop de glucose, amidon de BLÉ, sel, poudres à lever (carbonates d'ammonium, carbonates de sodium), émulsifiant (lecithines de SOJA), arôme.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chocolat au lait or Croc sablé Goût choco?
Overall, Croc sablé Goût choco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Croc sablé Goût choco has fewer calories: 499 kcal versus 539 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Croc sablé Goût choco has less sugar: 29 g versus 55 g per 100 g.