Choco Krispies vs Smacks
Overall, Smacks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Choco Krispies | Smacks |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 391 kcal | 377 kcal |
| Fat | 1.9 g | 1.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 17 g | 34 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.8 g | 5 g |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 7.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Smacks has 67% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.9 g).
- Choco Krispies has 50% less sugar (17 g vs 34 g).
- Smacks has 97% less salt (0 g vs 0.6 g).
- Smacks has 24% more fiber (5 g vs 3.8 g).
- Smacks has 11% more protein (7.1 g vs 6.3 g).
- Choco Krispies has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Choco Krispies
Arroz, azúcar, jarabe de glucosa, cacao desgrasado en polvo, sal, pasta de cacao, extracto de malta de cebada, aromas, niacina, hierro, vitamina B6, riboflavina, tiamina, ácido fólico, vitamina D, vitamina B12. Para alérgenos ver ingredientes destacados en negrita. Puede contener gluten de otros cereales. MConsumir preferentemente antes del: ver parte KOSHER e PAREV superior.
Smacks
Weizen (54%), Zucker, Glukosesirup
FAQ
Which is healthier: Choco Krispies or Smacks?
Overall, Smacks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Smacks has fewer calories: 377 kcal versus 391 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Choco Krispies has less sugar: 17 g versus 34 g per 100 g.