Choco Rice vs Smacks
Overall, Smacks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Choco Rice | Smacks |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 387 kcal | 377 kcal |
| Fat | 2.8 g | 1.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 22 g | 34 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 4 g | 5 g |
| Protein | 8.3 g | 7.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Lupin, Milk, Mustard, Peanuts, Sesame seeds, Avoine | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Smacks has 43% less fat (1.6 g vs 2.8 g).
- Smacks has 73% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 1.1 g).
- Choco Rice has 35% less sugar (22 g vs 34 g).
- Smacks has 20% more fiber (5 g vs 4 g).
- Choco Rice has 14% more protein (8.3 g vs 7.1 g).
- Only Choco Rice lists: Lupin, Milk, Mustard, Peanuts, Sesame seeds, Avoine.
Ingredients
Choco Rice
Farine de riz 39%, farine de blé 30%, chocolat en poudre 20% (sucre, cacao en poudre), sirop de glucose, sucre, huile de tournesol, sel, extrait de malt d'orge, arôme naturel de cacao, arôme naturel. Peut contenir des traces d'arachides, de fruits à coque, de lait, de soja, de graines de sésame, de moutarde et de lupin.
Smacks
Weizen (54%), Zucker, Glukosesirup
FAQ
Which is healthier: Choco Rice or Smacks?
Overall, Smacks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Smacks has fewer calories: 377 kcal versus 387 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Choco Rice has less sugar: 22 g versus 34 g per 100 g.