Rice Snaps vs Smacks
Overall, Rice Snaps has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rice Snaps | Smacks |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 391 kcal | 377 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 1.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 4.9 g | 34 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.6 g | 5 g |
| Protein | 7.9 g | 7.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rice Snaps has 19% less fat (1.3 g vs 1.6 g).
- Rice Snaps has 86% less sugar (4.9 g vs 34 g).
- Smacks has 96% less salt (0 g vs 0.5 g).
- Smacks has 68% more fiber (5 g vs 1.6 g).
- Rice Snaps has 10% more protein (7.9 g vs 7.1 g).
- Rice Snaps has the better Nutri-Score.
- Rice Snaps is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Rice Snaps
Rice, Sugar, Salt, Barley Malt Extract, Iron, Niacin, Pantothenic Acid, Riboflavin, Vitamin B6, Thiamin, Folic Acid, Vitamin D, Vitamin B12.
Smacks
Weizen (54%), Zucker, Glukosesirup
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rice Snaps or Smacks?
Overall, Rice Snaps has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Smacks has fewer calories: 377 kcal versus 391 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rice Snaps has less sugar: 4.9 g versus 34 g per 100 g.