Smacks vs Coco Pops Chocos
Overall, Coco Pops Chocos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Smacks | Coco Pops Chocos |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 377 kcal | 380 kcal |
| Fat | 1.6 g | 2.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 34 g | 22 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 5 g | 6 g |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Smacks has 27% less fat (1.6 g vs 2.2 g).
- Smacks has 70% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 1 g).
- Coco Pops Chocos has 35% less sugar (22 g vs 34 g).
- Smacks has 97% less salt (0 g vs 0.7 g).
- Coco Pops Chocos has 17% more fiber (6 g vs 5 g).
- Coco Pops Chocos has 29% more protein (10 g vs 7.1 g).
- Coco Pops Chocos has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Smacks
Weizen (54%), Zucker, Glukosesirup
Coco Pops Chocos
(FR) CÉRÉALES DE BLÉ GOÛT CHOCOLAT, ENRICHIES EN VITAMINES ET FER. INGRÉDIENTS: Farine de blé (72%), sucre, chocolat en poudre (10%) (sucre, cacao en poudre), cacao maigre en poudre, sirop de glucose, sel, arôme naturel, cannelle, niacine, fer, vitamine B6, riboflavine, thiamine, acide folique, vitamine D, vitamine B12.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Smacks or Coco Pops Chocos?
Overall, Coco Pops Chocos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Smacks has fewer calories: 377 kcal versus 380 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Coco Pops Chocos has less sugar: 22 g versus 34 g per 100 g.