Chickpea Rotini vs Chickpea Fusilli Pasta
Overall, Chickpea Fusilli Pasta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chickpea Rotini | Chickpea Fusilli Pasta |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 339 kcal | 339 kcal |
| Fat | 6.2 g | 4.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 3.5 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 14.1 g | 10.7 g |
| Protein | 21.2 g | 19.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chickpea Fusilli Pasta has 28% less fat (4.5 g vs 6.2 g).
- Chickpea Fusilli Pasta has no saturated fat, while Chickpea Rotini has 0.9 g.
- Chickpea Fusilli Pasta has 49% less sugar (1.8 g vs 3.5 g).
- Chickpea Rotini has 24% more fiber (14.1 g vs 10.7 g).
- Chickpea Rotini is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Chickpea Rotini
CHICKPEA FLOUR.
Chickpea Fusilli Pasta
CHICKPEAS, TAPIOCA FLOUR, GUAR GUM
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chickpea Rotini or Chickpea Fusilli Pasta?
Overall, Chickpea Fusilli Pasta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chickpea Rotini has fewer calories: 339 kcal versus 339 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chickpea Fusilli Pasta has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.