Cerecof vs Cerealia 100% farinha de centeio
Overall, Cerecof has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cerecof | Cerealia 100% farinha de cen... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 7 kcal | 846 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 11.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 3.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 12.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 3.6 g |
| Fiber | — | 28.6 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 39.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 5 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cerecof has 99% fewer calories (7 kcal vs 846 kcal).
- Cerecof has no fat, while Cerealia 100% farinha de centeio has 11.4 g.
- Cerecof has no saturated fat, while Cerealia 100% farinha de centeio has 3.9 g.
- Cerecof has 99% less sugar (0.1 g vs 12.5 g).
- Cerecof has no salt, while Cerealia 100% farinha de centeio has 3.6 g.
- Cerealia 100% farinha de centeio has 100% more protein (39.3 g vs 0.1 g).
- Cerecof is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Cerecof
Chicorée 40%, seigle*, orge*, malt d'orge*, figues, glands. *Céréales garanties non traitées.
Cerealia 100% farinha de centeio
Farinha de CENTEIO (48%), água, glúten de TRIGO, farelo de CENTEIO, azeite (0,8%), levedura, sal, emulsionantes: E 471, E 472e (contêm TRIGO), conservantes (E 282, E 200), aroma, agente de tratamento da farinha: ácido ascórbico (contém TRIGO). Pode conter MOSTARDA e SOJA. Consumir de preferência antes de; (ver frente da embalagem).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cerecof or Cerealia 100% farinha de centeio?
Overall, Cerecof has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cerecof has fewer calories: 7 kcal versus 846 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cerecof has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 12.5 g per 100 g.