Cerecof vs Nesquik Family Pack
Overall, Cerecof has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cerecof | Nesquik Family Pack |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 7 kcal | 386 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 3.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 75.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 5.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cerecof has 98% fewer calories (7 kcal vs 386 kcal).
- Cerecof has no fat, while Nesquik Family Pack has 3.9 g.
- Cerecof has no saturated fat, while Nesquik Family Pack has 1.6 g.
- Cerecof has 100% less sugar (0.1 g vs 75.1 g).
- Cerecof has no salt, while Nesquik Family Pack has 1 g.
- Nesquik Family Pack has 98% more protein (5.1 g vs 0.1 g).
- Cerecof is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Cerecof lists: Gluten.
- Only Nesquik Family Pack lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Cerecof
Chicorée 40%, seigle*, orge*, malt d'orge*, figues, glands. *Céréales garanties non traitées.
Nesquik Family Pack
Suiker, mager cacaopoeder** (23%), emulgator: SOJAlecithine, zout, vitaminen (C,D), natuurlijk aroma, kaneel, ,quot,Rainforest Alliance gecertificeerd
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cerecof or Nesquik Family Pack?
Overall, Cerecof has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cerecof has fewer calories: 7 kcal versus 386 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cerecof has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 75.1 g per 100 g.