Cauliflower & Broccoli Florets vs Pour potage maraicher
Overall, Cauliflower & Broccoli Florets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cauliflower & Broccoli Flore... | Pour potage maraicher |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 29 kcal | 34 kcal |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 3.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 2.7 g |
| Protein | 2.6 g | 1.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Celery |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cauliflower & Broccoli Florets has 15% fewer calories (29 kcal vs 34 kcal).
- Pour potage maraicher has no fat, while Cauliflower & Broccoli Florets has 0.7 g.
- Cauliflower & Broccoli Florets has 39% less sugar (2 g vs 3.3 g).
- Pour potage maraicher has 11% more fiber (2.7 g vs 2.4 g).
- Cauliflower & Broccoli Florets has 35% more protein (2.6 g vs 1.7 g).
- Cauliflower & Broccoli Florets is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Pour potage maraicher lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Cauliflower & Broccoli Florets
cauliflower, broccoli
Pour potage maraicher
Carottes en cubes 23.2% min., choux-fleurs 10.4% min., pommes de terre en cubes 8.8% min., poireaux 8.8% min., navets en cubes 8.8% min., haricots coupés 8% min., petits pois très fins 6.4% min., _céleri_ 5.6% min.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cauliflower & Broccoli Florets or Pour potage maraicher?
Overall, Cauliflower & Broccoli Florets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cauliflower & Broccoli Florets has fewer calories: 29 kcal versus 34 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cauliflower & Broccoli Florets has less sugar: 2 g versus 3.3 g per 100 g.