Comparison

Cashewkerne, naturbelassen vs Cashew Nuts Unsalted (Anacardos sin sal)

Overall, Cashew Nuts Unsalted (Anacardos sin sal) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCashewkerne, naturbelassenCashew Nuts Unsalted (Anacar...
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 603 kcal 605 kcal
Fat 47.1 g 48.4 g
Saturated fat 9.3 g 8.4 g
Sugars 6.2 g 5.9 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 3.1 g 8.4 g
Protein 21 g 18.6 g
Additives00
AllergensNutsNuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cashew Nuts Unsalted (Anacardos sin sal) has 63% more fiber (8.4 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Cashewkerne, naturbelassen has 11% more protein (21 g vs 18.6 g).
  • Cashew Nuts Unsalted (Anacardos sin sal) has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Cashewkerne, naturbelassen

Cashewkerne. Kann Spuren von anderen Schalenfrüchten und Erdnüssen enthalten.

Cashew Nuts Unsalted (Anacardos sin sal)

_Noix de cajou_ 96,5%, huile de tournesol

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cashewkerne, naturbelassen or Cashew Nuts Unsalted (Anacardos sin sal)?

Overall, Cashew Nuts Unsalted (Anacardos sin sal) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cashewkerne, naturbelassen has fewer calories: 603 kcal versus 605 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cashew Nuts Unsalted (Anacardos sin sal) has less sugar: 5.9 g versus 6.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons