Cashewkerne, naturbelassen vs Notenmengeling
Overall, Notenmengeling has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cashewkerne, naturbelassen | Notenmengeling |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 603 kcal | 630 kcal |
| Fat | 47.1 g | 55 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.3 g | 5.7 g |
| Sugars | 6.2 g | 4.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.1 g | 7.5 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | Nuts, Peanuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cashewkerne, naturbelassen has 14% less fat (47.1 g vs 55 g).
- Notenmengeling has 39% less saturated fat (5.7 g vs 9.3 g).
- Notenmengeling has 31% less sugar (4.3 g vs 6.2 g).
- Notenmengeling has 59% more fiber (7.5 g vs 3.1 g).
- Cashewkerne, naturbelassen has 19% more protein (21 g vs 17 g).
- Notenmengeling has the better Nutri-Score.
- Notenmengeling is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Notenmengeling lists: Peanuts.
Ingredients
Cashewkerne, naturbelassen
Cashewkerne. Kann Spuren von anderen Schalenfrüchten und Erdnüssen enthalten.
Notenmengeling
32% HAZELNOTEN, 29% CASHEWNOTEN, 23% WALNOOTPITTEN 16% AMANDELNOTEN, KAN SPOREN VAN PINDA, SOJA, ALLE ANDERE NOTEN EN SESAM BEVATTEN,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cashewkerne, naturbelassen or Notenmengeling?
Overall, Notenmengeling has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cashewkerne, naturbelassen has fewer calories: 603 kcal versus 630 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Notenmengeling has less sugar: 4.3 g versus 6.2 g per 100 g.