Cannellini beans vs Alubia blanca riñón
Overall, Alubia blanca riñón has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cannellini beans | Alubia blanca riñón |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 61 kcal | 266 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 2.1 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 2.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 4.4 g | 34 g |
| Protein | 4.3 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cannellini beans has 77% fewer calories (61 kcal vs 266 kcal).
- Cannellini beans has no fat, while Alubia blanca riñón has 2.1 g.
- Cannellini beans has 78% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.3 g).
- Alubia blanca riñón has 87% more fiber (34 g vs 4.4 g).
- Alubia blanca riñón has 80% more protein (22 g vs 4.3 g).
- Alubia blanca riñón has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Cannellini beans
Cannellini Beans, Water.
Alubia blanca riñón
Alúbia riñón.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cannellini beans or Alubia blanca riñón?
Overall, Alubia blanca riñón has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cannellini beans has fewer calories: 61 kcal versus 266 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cannellini beans has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.