Comparison

Buttergemüse (TK) vs Soja Natur vegan

Overall, Soja Natur vegan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientButtergemüse (TK)Soja Natur vegan
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 109 kcal 45 kcal
Fat 6.9 g 2.9 g
Saturated fat 4.5 g 0.4 g
Sugars 3.1 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.9 g 0.1 g
Fiber 3.2 g 0.5 g
Protein 2.7 g 4.8 g
Additives00
AllergensMilkSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Soja Natur vegan has 59% fewer calories (45 kcal vs 109 kcal).
  • Soja Natur vegan has 58% less fat (2.9 g vs 6.9 g).
  • Soja Natur vegan has 91% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 4.5 g).
  • Soja Natur vegan has 84% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Soja Natur vegan has 89% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Buttergemüse (TK) has 84% more fiber (3.2 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Soja Natur vegan has 44% more protein (4.8 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Soja Natur vegan has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Soja Natur vegan is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Buttergemüse (TK) lists: Milk.
  • Only Soja Natur vegan lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Buttergemüse (TK)

Gemüse 85 % (Erbsen*, Karotten*, Blumenkohl*, Mais*), BUTTER* 8 %, Meersalz, Petersilie*, Maisstärke*, Gewürze* (Muskat*, Pfeffer*) *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft. Kann Spuren von Gluten, Soja und Sellerie enthalten.

Soja Natur vegan

Soja Drink* 99 % (Wasser, SOJABOHNEN* geschält 9,2 %), Milchsäurebakterienkulturen *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft

FAQ

Which is healthier: Buttergemüse (TK) or Soja Natur vegan?

Overall, Soja Natur vegan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Soja Natur vegan has fewer calories: 45 kcal versus 109 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Soja Natur vegan has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons