Comparison

Breaded cod fillet vs Croccole

Overall, Breaded cod fillet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBreaded cod filletCroccole
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 179 kcal 208 kcal
Fat 6.9 g 7.8 g
Saturated fat 0.6 g 0.7 g
Sugars 2.8 g 0.7 g
Salt 0.6 g 1 g
Fiber 1 g 0.1 g
Protein 14.4 g 11 g
Additives10
AllergensFish, GlutenFish, Gluten, Mustard

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Breaded cod fillet has 14% fewer calories (179 kcal vs 208 kcal).
  • Breaded cod fillet has 12% less fat (6.9 g vs 7.8 g).
  • Croccole has 75% less sugar (0.7 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Breaded cod fillet has 38% less salt (0.6 g vs 1 g).
  • Breaded cod fillet has 91% more fiber (1 g vs 0.1 g).
  • Breaded cod fillet has 24% more protein (14.4 g vs 11 g).
  • Breaded cod fillet has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Croccole lists: Mustard.

Ingredients

Breaded cod fillet

Cod (Fish) (65%). Wheatflour contains Gluten (with Wheatflour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin) Rapeseed Oil Durum Wheat Semolina (contains Gluten) Wheat Starch (contains Gluten) Wheat Gluten Salt Yeast Malted Barley Flour (contains Gluten) Colour: Paprika Extract.

Croccole

Filetti di MERLUZZO d'Alaska o MERLUZZO del Pacifico 51%*, farina di FRUMENTO, acqua, olio vegetale di colza, sale, amido di FRUMENTO, SENAPE, lievito, destrosio, zucchero, paprica, curcuma. Può contenere tracce di _LATTE_.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Breaded cod fillet or Croccole?

Overall, Breaded cod fillet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Breaded cod fillet has fewer calories: 179 kcal versus 208 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Croccole has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 2.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons