Comparison

Bonito salata icre hering și ceapa vs Huevas de pescado

Overall, Huevas de pescado has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBonito salata icre hering și...Huevas de pescado
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group — 4
Calories 557 kcal 360 kcal
Fat 60 g 40 g
Saturated fat 6.6 g 4.6 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt 1.6 g 1.2 g
Protein 2.7 g 10 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedEggs

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Huevas de pescado has 35% fewer calories (360 kcal vs 557 kcal).
  • Huevas de pescado has 33% less fat (40 g vs 60 g).
  • Huevas de pescado has 30% less saturated fat (4.6 g vs 6.6 g).
  • Huevas de pescado has no sugar, while Bonito salata icre hering și ceapa has 0.5 g.
  • Huevas de pescado has 24% less salt (1.2 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Huevas de pescado has 73% more protein (10 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Huevas de pescado has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Huevas de pescado lists: Eggs.

Ingredients

Bonito salata icre hering și ceapa

Not available.

Huevas de pescado

Huevas de pescado, aceite de girasol, clara de huevo, aroma de limón y sal

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bonito salata icre hering și ceapa or Huevas de pescado?

Overall, Huevas de pescado has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Huevas de pescado has fewer calories: 360 kcal versus 557 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Huevas de pescado has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons