Bonito salata icre hering și ceapa vs Huevas de lumpo
Overall, Huevas de lumpo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bonito salata icre hering și... | Huevas de lumpo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 557 kcal | 88 kcal |
| Fat | 60 g | 4.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.6 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 3.9 g |
| Protein | 2.7 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Huevas de lumpo has 84% fewer calories (88 kcal vs 557 kcal).
- Huevas de lumpo has 93% less fat (4.5 g vs 60 g).
- Huevas de lumpo has 88% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 6.6 g).
- Huevas de lumpo has no sugar, while Bonito salata icre hering și ceapa has 0.5 g.
- Bonito salata icre hering și ceapa has 60% less salt (1.6 g vs 3.9 g).
- Huevas de lumpo has 78% more protein (12 g vs 2.7 g).
Ingredients
Bonito salata icre hering și ceapa
Not available.
Huevas de lumpo
E Hueva de lumpo 88%, agua, sal, colorantes (E-150, - 51, estabilizante (E-413), acidulante (E-330), conservador (E21 Peso neto T5g
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bonito salata icre hering și ceapa or Huevas de lumpo?
Overall, Huevas de lumpo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Huevas de lumpo has fewer calories: 88 kcal versus 557 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Huevas de lumpo has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.