Heide-Forellen Caviar vs Bonito salata icre hering și ceapa
Overall, Heide-Forellen Caviar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Heide-Forellen Caviar | Bonito salata icre hering și... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 197 kcal | 557 kcal |
| Fat | 9.1 g | 60 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.8 g | 6.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 3.4 g | 1.6 g |
| Protein | 26.1 g | 2.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Heide-Forellen Caviar has 65% fewer calories (197 kcal vs 557 kcal).
- Heide-Forellen Caviar has 85% less fat (9.1 g vs 60 g).
- Heide-Forellen Caviar has 73% less saturated fat (1.8 g vs 6.6 g).
- Bonito salata icre hering și ceapa has 54% less salt (1.6 g vs 3.4 g).
- Heide-Forellen Caviar has 90% more protein (26.1 g vs 2.7 g).
Ingredients
Heide-Forellen Caviar
Not available.
Bonito salata icre hering și ceapa
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Heide-Forellen Caviar or Bonito salata icre hering și ceapa?
Overall, Heide-Forellen Caviar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Heide-Forellen Caviar has fewer calories: 197 kcal versus 557 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bonito salata icre hering și ceapa has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.