Salata cu icre de hering si ceapa vs Huevas de pescado
Overall, Huevas de pescado has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Salata cu icre de hering si... | Huevas de pescado |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 553 kcal | 360 kcal |
| Fat | 60.1 g | 40 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.5 g | 4.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 2.8 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Huevas de pescado has 35% fewer calories (360 kcal vs 553 kcal).
- Huevas de pescado has 33% less fat (40 g vs 60.1 g).
- Huevas de pescado has 29% less saturated fat (4.6 g vs 6.5 g).
- Huevas de pescado has 26% less salt (1.2 g vs 1.6 g).
- Huevas de pescado has 72% more protein (10 g vs 2.8 g).
- Huevas de pescado has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Huevas de pescado lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Salata cu icre de hering si ceapa
ceapă, icre hering, sare, pesmet (făină de grâu, sare, drojdie), agenti gelatinizanti: gumã de guar, gumă de xantan, conservanti: acid sorbic, benzoat de sodiu, acidifiant: acid citric, colorant: caramel, aromă
Huevas de pescado
Huevas de pescado, aceite de girasol, clara de huevo, aroma de limón y sal
FAQ
Which is healthier: Salata cu icre de hering si ceapa or Huevas de pescado?
Overall, Huevas de pescado has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Huevas de pescado has fewer calories: 360 kcal versus 553 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Huevas de pescado has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.