Blumenbrot Bio Knusperbrot Buchweizen vs Spécial matin Douceur Châtaigne
Overall, Blumenbrot Bio Knusperbrot Buchweizen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Blumenbrot Bio Knusperbrot Buchweizen
Spécial matin Douceur Châtaigne
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Blumenbrot Bio Knusperbrot B... | Spécial matin Douceur Châtai... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 348 kcal | 375 kcal |
| Fat | 2.1 g | 1.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 2.7 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 4.1 g | 3.1 g |
| Protein | 11.2 g | 7.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Spécial matin Douceur Châtaigne has 21% less fat (1.7 g vs 2.1 g).
- Blumenbrot Bio Knusperbrot Buchweizen has 25% less sugar (2 g vs 2.7 g).
- Blumenbrot Bio Knusperbrot Buchweizen has 24% more fiber (4.1 g vs 3.1 g).
- Blumenbrot Bio Knusperbrot Buchweizen has 35% more protein (11.2 g vs 7.3 g).
- Blumenbrot Bio Knusperbrot Buchweizen has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Blumenbrot Bio Knusperbrot Buchweizen
Buchweizenmehl, Vollrohrzucker (< 2%), Meersalz
Spécial matin Douceur Châtaigne
Farine de riz demi-complète*, farine de souchet*, farine de châtaigne* (8%), sel marin, *issus de l'agriculture biologique
FAQ
Which is healthier: Blumenbrot Bio Knusperbrot Buchweizen or Spécial matin Douceur Châtaigne?
Overall, Blumenbrot Bio Knusperbrot Buchweizen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Blumenbrot Bio Knusperbrot Buchweizen has fewer calories: 348 kcal versus 375 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Blumenbrot Bio Knusperbrot Buchweizen has less sugar: 2 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.