Bismarck Hering vs Sursild
Overall, Bismarck Hering has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Bismarck Hering
Sursild
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bismarck Hering | Sursild |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 150 kcal | 215 kcal |
| Fat | 9.9 g | 8 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.5 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 4.8 g | 25 g |
| Salt | 3 g | 2.8 g |
| Protein | 10.2 g | 7.3 g |
| Additives | 4 | 1 |
| Allergens | Fish, Mustard, Natriummetabisulfit | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bismarck Hering has 30% fewer calories (150 kcal vs 215 kcal).
- Sursild has 19% less fat (8 g vs 9.9 g).
- Sursild has 20% less saturated fat (2 g vs 2.5 g).
- Bismarck Hering has 81% less sugar (4.8 g vs 25 g).
- Bismarck Hering has 28% more protein (10.2 g vs 7.3 g).
- Bismarck Hering has the better Nutri-Score.
- Bismarck Hering is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Bismarck Hering lists: Mustard, Natriummetabisulfit.
Ingredients
Bismarck Hering
50% _Hering_, 45% Marinadenaufguss (Wasser, Branntweinessig, Zucker, Speisesalz), 4% marinierte Zwiebeln (Zwiebeln, Wasser, Säuerungsmittel: Essigsäure, Citronensäure; Speisesalz, Antioxidationsmittel: _Natriummetabisulfit_, Ascorbinsäure), marinierte Karotten (Karotten, Branntweinessig, Speisesalz), _Senfsaaten_, Lorbeerblatt.
Sursild
Marinert _sild_ (45%), sukker, løk (18%), vann, salt, eddik, pepper, aroma, korerveringsmiddel (natriumbenzoat).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bismarck Hering or Sursild?
Overall, Bismarck Hering has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bismarck Hering has fewer calories: 150 kcal versus 215 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bismarck Hering has less sugar: 4.8 g versus 25 g per 100 g.