Comparison
Bio Kakaonibs vs Cacoa nibs
Overall, Cacoa nibs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio Kakaonibs | Cacoa nibs |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 642 kcal | 585 kcal |
| Fat | 53 g | 52 g |
| Saturated fat | 32 g | 30 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 27 g | 23 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Nuts, Sesame seeds, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cacoa nibs has 25% less sugar (1.5 g vs 2 g).
- Bio Kakaonibs has 15% more fiber (27 g vs 23 g).
- Cacoa nibs is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Bio Kakaonibs lists: Gluten, Nuts, Sesame seeds, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Bio Kakaonibs
100% Kakao, _Gluten_, _Soja_, _Sesam_, _Mandeln_, _Haselnüsse_, _Walnüsse_, Cashew_
Cacoa nibs
100% Kakaonibs
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio Kakaonibs or Cacoa nibs?
Overall, Cacoa nibs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cacoa nibs has fewer calories: 585 kcal versus 642 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cacoa nibs has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 2 g per 100 g.